I find it fascinating that the last 2 comments are at complete odds with each other. I can totally see why. The 1st comment (which was not at all helpful) speaks to the "primitive" nature of the style and the non-idealized figures (balding man, nearly masculine women). The 2nd poster has gone waaaay to the other end of the spectrum, by seeing the composition, the layering of the figures, the choice of flat colors for those figures.

I hope people can learn from imagery that is not necessarily to their tastes.

Though these works are "erotic" in the sense that they are somewhat sexual in nature, I prefer a bit more fantasy to my erotica, not always "perfection" or "idealization", but I also want to be attracted to it as well as aroused by it. Of course this raises the question of "porn"/"erotica"/"art". :)

Of the half dozen or so "illustrators" in this section, YOURS is by FAR the most sophisticated. Although I've seen this style many times before, your execution, draftmanship, and composition put you ahead of your "rivals''---not that art is a silly contest. Continue to WORK, WORK, WORK......furiously; there is so little time.....

you have great talent...MORE>>>MORE

You have the raw talent to do it.

you're attention to detail, not just visual but emotional, is excellent and your shading work leaves little lacking. brilliant sketch, you certainly have the natural talent, especially for conveying the raw emotion of the scene, which is extremely hard to do. Beautiful.