R Rated

(and I'm an American no less!) - a sexy little tidbit of an encounter.

5 from me and now hoping that you've published more

I'm typing this around midnight, Western time, and this was just an insultingly silly story.

However, much too short so I could only rate it 3 stars.

Liked your story, take no notice of the adverse comments. I took my wife to a theatre that had a erotic film, we were young, there was nudity and implied sex but no full on sex. I would have described my wife as conservative, at the half time interval i asked if she wanted to go home, no, we went back in. After awhile she reached for my hand and put it on her knee, i moved my hand up, she parted her legs, i moved it higher to discover that she had removed her panties. I began slowly fingering her, a rape scene came on, she moved against my hand, i pushed a finger inside her, still fingering her hard clit and she closed her legs hard, trapping my hand as she orgasmed. Throughout the rest of the film i brought her to 3 more orgasms. When the film finished, we got up, i was trying to hide my erection. We drove, she said pull over there. It was a small park near a river. Undo your pants quick, i did, my cock sprang out, fuck me, we only had a small car. I looked around, i got out, went round to her door, unlocked it, on your knees, she quickly turned sideways, lifted her dress, and i fucked her hard and fast, my cum blasting into her, don't stop, i saw 2 people walking towards us in the distance, i kept fucking, that's it, that's it and i felt her orgasm, so wet around me, then she just seemed to collapse. I pulled back, quickly shut the door, got back in my side and drove away. We went often to see erotic films.

Passing judgement on others private relationship agreements is not and should not be my purview. However, responding to a comment made by yourself, not the actual story, about leaving "Steve" in the dark is fair game in that you convey a certain about of hubris in your leaving him in the dark, at least in my opinion. Of course he may have requested that you keep him blissfully uniformed which changes the complexion of the arrangement. As I said before, it really isn't mine to judge your or anyone else's relationship. I do think it's fair game to respond to the comment.

People come to Loving Wives for many reasons. I was naive enough, and dumb enough to not read the subtitle, that initially I thought some wives actually loved their husbands in these stories. And some do. I will also confess that I have been hurt by the other kind of "loving wife" and that colours (nod to British spelling here) my reactions. These days I have used Loving Wives as therapy, forcing me to face and address the hurts and pains that I have largely inflicted upon myself. I'm less and less interested in the section with each story read because, I believe, I'm dealing with myself. But, as one who was "Blissfully Unaware" and not by choice I react stronger than most having wasted 18 years of my life on a fairy tale. But that's not your responsibility.

Do you actually believe that today's society and mores are more enlightened than the 17th century? I've seen no evidence of it and find it ironic that many who make that claim will characterize deceit and betrayal as somehow enlightened. What consenting adults do sexually is no business of mine but to consent one has to be aware. Pride of deception is sad.

I think that part of your perception of the Puritan's in North American is misinformed or coloured by your own presuppositions. Let me say that I am not an apologist for the Puritan ethic but to characterize them as wanting to force their morals on the community is simply wrong. Folks were invited to join a community that held those standards (rightly or wrongly) and those who came, came with that in mind. Like you, I suspect, I am opposed to forcing morality on others but that was not the case in the original colonies.

Thank you for your reasoned and reasonable response to my comment. I would challenge the assertion that modern day Britain or Europe is more enlightened than the Puritans of the past, just different agendas. And to clarify again, while the "open" lifestyle turned out to be not for me (an the vast majority of those with whom I have corresponded over the years about the lifestyle in retrospect) what any couple does is their business. I do object to deceit and betrayal and any rationalization thereof.

I apologise for the length and disorganisation of this comment. I wish you well and success in the writing that you do.

I think you've done a beautiful job telling a story that follows a simple but compelling erotic idea. This was posted in Loving Wives, a catalog of some of the most base stories of adultery and cuckolding, presumably a category of story your critics enjoy, yet their comments indicate that they can't tolerate infidelity. Ridiculous.

Great effort. I personally love this scenario and have talked with many friends and lovers about it, or versions of it, many times. I have never been "the guy in the story" but have often thought about how to pull it off. I was glad to see your take on it.

Thanks.

Thank you seekeraz for including your moniker with your comment. You give voice to a legitimate point of view and I respect that, although one always finds oneself on thin ice passing comment on other people's marriages. It is simply impossible to know (and unbecoming and inappropriate to ask) anything about the private agreements and arrangements they might have.

Puritans were those who remained behind to purify the church. It is an understandable (and a common misbelief) to think that the Puritans were those who emigrated. In northwest Europe Puritans were responsible for some of the most restrictive and vindictive legislation of the seventeenth century. During Great Britain's doomed experiment with Republicanism things reached an apotheosis and the monarchy was restored in 1660 to general rejoicing. Those who left Leiden - and then Plymouth, in 1620 in first Speedwell and later Mayflower did not describe themselves as Puritans but "Saints". They left Leiden in order to found a colony in the New World where they could impose their beliefs on everyone in the community (Holland being far too liberal for them). Some of these beliefs can be discerned in attitudes that are still influential in North America today. I pass no direct judgement on these. I simply do not believe they are attitudes that in general further the growth of the human spirit.

Don't go in for relationship but for cohabitation. Why marry at all?

"As for Steve (not his real name, obviously). He remains blissfully unaware and I don't intend to tell him. "

If you have some sort of agreement that sex outside of the relationship is acceptable, no worries. But if Steve is "blissfully unaware" that is reprehensible, not because of the sex itself but because of the deception. Perhaps yours is a marriage of convenience and not of commitment. You might want to let "Steve" know about it however. He needs to know that you are not to be trusted.

BTW you guys sent your Puritans across the pond but you created them. You also gave us rapacious capitalism and environmental destruction. Lying, deceit, and betrayal are not enlightened thinking, they are character flaws and they are done by choice.

You are the guardian of yourself and your standards and they are not mine to judge but I do feel sorry for "Steve"

Thank you for all the encouragement. This was my first effort and I held back on uploading it but decided to go ahead after a few drinks on Saturday night. It's the truest of my stories, some of which appear on here and most of which appear elsewhere. My pseudonym here, Badidea, was inspired by what my publisher told me when I let her know I'd been thinking of doing some writing for Literotica. The 211 is an in-joke. The story is based on truth and is about something that happened last autumn. The film wasn't La Choix, but most of the rest was pretty much accurate. It's touching to see the encouragement from some of you. I sponsor writers myself through a writing group in London so I do know that this sort of encouragement has a genuinely positive effect. Please do keep it up, and don't feed the trolls. None of us pay them any attention.

I am well aware of Anna Karenina, but she was not remotely an influence (although perhaps Emma Bovary was - in a small way if you're desperate to find a progeny in nineteenth century European literature). It's also wonderful to find so many of you concerned for my safety. I feel like I have an anonymous army of older brothers all reaching out to me with earnest advice! However, I really am a big enough girl to look after myself. I do appreciate the risks you're warning me about though.

This happened about two months ago. The stranger wasn't actually completely unknown to me. Our art house club cinema is members-only and I'd seen him before, and I sort of know his wife through a friend of a friend. Many of the most shocked voices here appear to be from Americans. It's odd that such a level of Puritanism still informs the American pov - especially when one thinks about the other brilliant young writers here who are obviously from the USA and who are breaking down barriers left, right and centre.

As for Steve (not his real name, obviously). He remains blissfully unaware and I don't intend to tell him. I don't think I'd go all the way with a stranger, but I don't suppose any of us really knows what we are capable of.

For story idea and plot I give a 3. Woman allows stranger to sex her up, because? Oh, he's kind of handsome, and well dressed, and persistent, and, well, apparently she wanted some strange sex. Kind of simple and base; not interesting nor dramatic.

For plot execution and character development I give a 3. Stranger grabs her knee in a dark theater and she does not immediately tell husband and management? Theater is dark, and she can't really see the stranger, but yet she can tell he is handsome and well dressed? She has no idea who stranger is, what stranger is, or where his fingers have been, but yet she welcomes his attention and his fingers into her body? Female character's actions and choices are so stupid and ignorant that it distracts the reader from the plot, if there was one. And what was the purpose of the husband's presence? More believable if she is alone or with girl friends. Instead of increasing tension and drama, you just make husband appear numb and bland. If watching erotica on screen husband's hands should be all over his wife, and whispering in her ear. Maybe you could have had husband and stranger share? Now that would be hot. Stupid, but hot. Unexplained and unbelievable characters are a distraction for thinking readers. And unthinking readers just want stroke material and could not care less about your writing quality.

For the story's contribution to enhancing or elevating the genre of exotic literature I give a 1. If you were a more experienced writer I would give everything a 1. But you have desire and some talent and that deserves encouragement and patience. But a story describing the beginning steps of a woman's decent into adultery and whoredom is just depressing. She exhibits only excitement and a desire for more. Read Tolstoy's Anna Karenina for a much better telling of a very similar woman and plot. And yes, from me Tolstoy gets the same scores I give you, so remember that before you take these rating too much to heart. And keep writing. P.S. I won't spoil Tolstoy's story by giving away the fate of the whore, but your female character will end up the same, either physically or emotionally.