Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.
You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.
Click here'I would say nine out of ten of them.'
'Exactly! But now that your way is leading, I don't have to try and "beat" you. The only thing I need to worry about is: Does Bryan's idea make sense? And if it does, there are no worries. And if it doesn't, then I can say something and Bryan will listen to me because that's how he operates. So when I realised that, I simply asked you your strategy and you explained it. And not only do I agree with what you said, but it was a hundred times better than anything I would have come up with.'
Becky brushed hair on his forehead with her fingertips.
'In other words, I am very happy with you and very happy with our marriage,' she said. 'Now can we please, please, please fuck?'
'I love it when you beg.'
'You're a bastard.'
Bryan smiled and kissed her. Becky kissed back, her mouth on his mouth, determined to prevent any further discourse. Bryan shifted his body, Becky pressed her feet into the bed, lifting her hips and opening herself up. Bryan's cock found the entrance to her vagina and he slid himself in. Becky cried out, grabbed him and begged for more.
Was Bryan a man who knew how to love a woman?
Who's to say? But he was certainly a man who knew how to fuck Becky Sandford. And although that may not be the perfect ending to a fairy tale, it was certainly a happy ending for them.
- COMMENTS
Loneandlevel15 days ago1) I think we all understand the psychobabble currently en vogue; the Alpha male, the hypergamy programming, etc. etc. But while it may be true with animals it's WAY over played with people. I've seen more people make decisions based on laziness and apathy than "biological drive to procreate" or "need to trade up".
2) Modern feminisim (the 60's and onward variety) is a classic example of institutionalism: the first priority of any institution is to perpetuate itself, even if the need for it is gone or it's no longer relevant.
3) Who'd a thunk: the One who designed the system knows best how to we should operate in it.
Anonymousabout 1 month ago"Dear God, please show me how to be a good mother. I swear I will do anything to be the best mother I can be for this little girl." '
'Now that is a vow,' he said. 'And tell me, Becky ... have you ever, even for a moment, been tempted to break it?'
/
Yes, she was tempted to break it. People who say “she’s a good mother even though she cheated on her husband” are WRONG! A woman who committed adultery has set a VERY bad example for her children. There’s no separation between wife and mother. The roles are intertwined.
/
ZK
Anonymousabout 1 month ago'Bryan, I can't help how I felt!'
'I'm not saying you can. I'm not even saying you should.'
/
Yes, she absolutely CAN help how she feels! Humans are capable of choosing our emotions, and our desires. By telling her that he doesn’t expect her to control her feelings, the husband is saying that she’s an incomplete person. A child who will never grow up.
/
If that’s the case, then she should be kept away from their daughter, and not allowed to influence her. She also shouldn’t be allowed to have any more children.
/
If the premise is that ALL women are incapable of emotional control, then the fundamentalist Muslims are completely right. If a woman can’t be trusted, and doesn’t really have free will, then she can’t be held accountable for anything. If someone can’t be held responsible, then they must have a legal guardian!
/
ZK
Anonymousabout 2 months agoThis version was ok but I didn’t really like the solution. The only way to solve this is for Linda to connect with Jim on a human level. There is no other person on the planet like Jim so if that is the basis of her love no other guy will measure up.
The obey thing just glosses over the problem without really addressing it so she is still going to want to cheat again at some stage and the resentment that would build over time from being Jim’s subordinate will probably make it happen. The “you don’t own me” mentality will come back worse than before and likely end the marriage.
Anonymous2 months agoI loved this one -- it is so much deeper than the other February Sucks versions.
Anonymous4 months agoProse and dialog is extremely well written. But this was too over the top with male vs female perspectives on unconditional love. And the "obey" came off as a tacky solution. Can understand unease and distrust after ther Marcus incident, but it went from a marital issue to a some philosophical sophistry. People are individuals and complex. Blanket statements about human behavior are narrow minded.
deepender6 months ago@AngelRider:
AngelRiderover 1 year ago
That so many of you are oblivious to the misogynistic themes is very sad. No Annie here. This is my account. I give zero fucks if anyone doesn't like it (sbrooks). This and the original are deeply bigoted and suggest women are incapable of honor and devotion. If you believe that, fuck you.
Well, Angel, it turns out that females ARE incapable of honor. In the common usage of the word, “honor” is directed outward towards others: wives, mentors, creditors, leaders, ancestors, ideals. Females defer only inwards…to their own bodies, feelings, sentiments, intuitions. This is neither a good nor a bad thing: it just is. Male “honor” implies a long term commitment lasting generations and stays constant in differing situations. Female “deference” is situational and can vary greatly in strength and requirements from parents to siblings, to children, to husband, to coworkers. Female “deference” is conditioned upon the feelings of the moment. It can be strong and constant and positive towards children and mercurial, disrespectful, and negative towards a husband from one moment to the next. Females are notorious for their prerogative to "change their minds” (actually, to defer to new feelings). A male either has honor or he does not.
.
This matter has been somewhat confused by the advent of “feminism”. “Feminism” is an ideology as is every word that ends in “-ism” (capitalism, communism, Catholicism, Protestantism, Neopaganism). As such, it is not amenable to either male “honor” or female “deference”: it is merely a head trip. It is, like all ideologies, a cast iron template smashed down upon Western society and culture (and, thankfully, no others). Those that adhere to an ideology can access the structure that it has manifested and gain the political cover that it affords, but they can neither grow nor create within it as it is a human construct with no life of its own. Thus, a true “feminist” cannot also be a woman, a wife, or a mother.
.
This my account. I believe it, but you cannot fuck me. If you a feminist, then you are fucking yourself…and there is no room for anyone else.
deepender6 months agoAnd that is how we are going to win: by exorcizing one femdom at a time until they are all good little loving wifies with US at the center of their universe. Just as it should be.
deepender6 months agoFor those of us who want to honestly pursue Mark's examination of romantic love, I heartily recommend "We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love" by Robert A. Johnson. I certainly hope that Mark read it.
