Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.
You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.
Click here
The squid-inspired orgy moved from the showers to the women's bungalow, where it continued for the next two weeks, with breaks for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and occasional sunbathing.
The guests, maids, manager, and caretakers understood, remembering the attraction among the group at the bistro. By the time the squid's chemicals fully cycled through, and libidos and minds returned to relative normalcy (not completely, Sue, Ethel, Rob, and Barrett would be noted for active sex lives afterwards), the relationship between aunt and niece, and best mates respectively, had changed considerably.
****
Two days after returning home, toned and tanned from assuredly the strangest, most insane vacation of her life, Sue was at work, sorting through script corrections.
A coworker, an annoying idiot Susan disliked, noticed her pensive, distracted look, and began to badger her with questions.
"So, that must have been a wild one. How was it?" he finally asked.
Sue looked at him without emotion. "We got raped and impregnated by a giant squid and fucked two Aussie boys for two weeks."
The man blinked, "Uh . . . okay," and left.
****
Author's note: the record is based upon a series of interviews given with the four individuals, and is consistent with rumored earlier encounters with the mysterious creature, or creatures, colloquially referred as the South Pacific Sand Squid.
The increased sex drive of the individuals, relative absence of psychological trauma, altered sexual orientation (further note: bisexual orientation was most likely present prior to said encounter but expressed due to erosion of psychological barriers by possibly chemical or biological means) remains consistent with follow up interviews with previous victims.
As no other sightings of said creature have occurred, nor any further evidence of physical or psychological trauma to Barrett Winford, his husband Rob Drummond, or Sue and Martha Brown, nor any manifestation of physical effects on their sons, also named Barrett and Rob, further inquiries are not recommended at this time.
Record Ends.
- COMMENTS
Anonymousabout 1 year agoThis was fun to read as long as it was tongue in cheek & taken with salt. I gave it 4 stars.
Bill S.
Anonymousalmost 6 years agoIn addition to his insistence on writing out ages, which is optional according to most grammarians, the previous Anonymous was equally wrong about the use of the quotation.
Anon claimed that there should have been “a period after "sis" and a capital "S" with "She" and another period after "smiled.'” Even ignoring poor Anon’s failure to use appropriate commas, there are still all sorts of problems with the statement, beginning with the fact that it’s simply incorrect. There was not only no need to place a period after ”sis” and then capitalize “she”— doing so would change the author’s meaning. As written, it is a sentence said with a smile. As Anon wanted to edit it, the sentence was spoken, and then the speaker smiled.
I am curious about the “basic rules of writing” to which Anon refers. Having been a professional editor, I have to ask— would that be the rules in the AP (Associated Press) Style Book? The MLA Style Book (that one’s the Modern Language Association). How about the APA Style Book (American Psychological Association)? I think I have at least one or two others on my shelves as well, including one with British rules, and British spellings. And guess what? They are all different! Unless Anon is referring to the grammar rules he was taught in fifth grade as the basic ones, I’d have to wonder which set of rules he was following (and then I’d still ask where he went for fifth grade!).
Anonymousalmost 6 years agoRe Anon 1: The corrections would have been more help had they been correct. Grade school grammar rules are not inflexible. Ages are almost never spelled out, and "she smiled" is perfectly acceptable as short for "she said with a smile".
Anonymousalmost 6 years agoTodger65 seems to be a popular editor, or maybe the only one regularly available, but he doesn't seem to know many of the basic rules of writing, like numbers under 100 need to be written out: "Her aunt was only 43, just under a decade older than herself. That may as well be 30 these days"
That should be "forty-three" and "thirty".
""An eccentric, crazy big sis," she smiled, " - He also doesn't know that people can't "smile" words. Should be a period after "sis" and a capital "S" with "She" and another period after "smiled.'
