All Comments on 'Fake News'

by Nils Huim

Sort by:
  • 8 Comments
reloader44reloader44over 6 years ago
shit

Well that was time I'll never get back

ihavetobelievethatitisihavetobelievethatitisover 6 years ago
What...

What on earth did I just read and how do I turn back time to not read it?

AnonymousAnonymousover 6 years ago
Too confusing with the grammar etc errors

Too confusing

clearedtofuckclearedtofuckover 6 years ago
Fake news? No, fake story.

This is a first class POS. Please don't write anymore.

sexymeupsexymeupover 6 years ago
total crap

was a waste of time to read, trash it and start over and get spell check and someone to edit for you. 1 star

AnonymousAnonymousover 6 years ago
Bollocks

Total load of bollocks

Robinius1Robinius1over 6 years ago
Not bad!

I don't see what the other commenters are talking about. This was fairly well written though I'm not sure what the [sic] references were about. I think what some didn't like was that there were no explicit descriptions of sex acts.

John may have gotten a good deal of satisfaction from turning his brother-in-law in to the police but I doubt it did him any good with his wife who he seems to still love. I see a divorce in the near future. He's probably better off without her but a man with no dick still faces a life all alone, most likely.

The story wasn't my cup of tea, so to speak, but I saw no reason for the comment telling the author to stop writing. Believe it or not stories have been written in which sex isn't the main theme. Thanks for sharing.

cybertron84cybertron8411 months ago

delete note pad this was .. what ever whats lower then trash is

Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous