by DonGarciaWallaceIII
Subject matter aside, this is confusing and disjointed. It may be carhartic for the author, but leaves the reader struggling to find eroticism or increased understanding.
As an at-times beautiful and poetic, but just as often clunky and monotonous, example of post-Structural, Derrida-like literature, I think this is a kind of masterpiece (even if it’s one that interrogates what the meanings (or uses) of masterpieces are. But erotic? Hardly. Eroticism seems a secondary consideration. I doubt this was cathartic, though. I think it’s an academic (and in places, again, beautiful and poetic) text. I guess I reluctantly recommend it as “lit-” but don’t recommend it as “-erotica.”