All Comments on 'Little Child'

I understand about a paternity test but this is fiction and it can be anything the author wants. It is their storyline not ours. If you want a different story than write it. We may read it and enjoy that as well.

Angry lunkhead makes and ass of himself and is saved assault charges by the bank security guard.

Loved it! Perfect everything, wouldn't change a thing.

Beautiful to see that husband and daughter had complete faith in Liz even if her father didn't.

Good 5 stars. No cuck here.

Bill S.

Weird and silly story

"Then, in 2007, DNA pioneer James Watson became the first person to get his genome sequenced for less than $1 million. "

So a DNA test was not really available in 2007 when this story was written. Give the author a break !

5*

Seachanger, while that is true, blood typing cannot confirm paternity but it could preclude it

Too much sermonizing, not enough storytelling...

Why dislike.?!

Went through All that shit.

DNA test and then sue the guy for slander etc.

Meanwhile duckhead husband is depressed and not being even any kind of father. So you made a storyline that I can't understand as MC came out looking like shit for brain

He mentioned judge doing test on his kids

Why didn't he simply do it

Good story. But suspect would still get a paternity test. Richards wad back asshole. Easy to slander someone when in a coma. They can't defend. Her father had zero faith in her and treated her fidelity like a business transaction.

Hmm not sure how to really comment on this situation on 1 hand he fully trusted his wife which is something a husband should always do when having been given no reason to think otherwise now the fact her dad was just going to throw money at the guy to make it go away and didn't trust his daughter is something as dad myself can't get behind not even remotely i cant help but to think the dad was hoping it was true and more than likely had it set for him to actually take it to court i think the dad was banking on the fact his daughter husband wouldn't challenge the claim by demanding a dna test but that can't be proven on the other hand once he found out it was a lie why didn't he sue him for slander anyways he would have some grounds to do so it would have been slim but still more importantly he should have responded with tell him ill see him in court then the judge would have ordered a DNA test and if the guy refused it would have told the judge admittedly that it was a false claim which would have served a couple of things 1 it would have gave claim to slander the judge would have admittedly awarded the claim to the victims and 2 would have showed attempt to extort venages or money from the victims which would have landed him in jail only good things really about this story is the husband trusted his wife and 2 the wife was a actual loving wife however the actions of the husband after the claim was made with the exception of trusting his wife is just something a man wouldn't do which if it was ever in doubt rather the writer was a woman or a man was completely without a doubt answered in this story cause the way the husband and dad acted again it was actions that no man and damn sure no dad would do not only was this person challenging him he was going after his family and a man would not put up with that in the calm manner the husband did and nor in the manner that the wife's dad was going to do that would have never even crossed there mind unless the person who was makes the offer had something to do with it in first place so unless the wife's dad had something to do with it him nor the husband acted in the manner of which a man would have handled it a man would have went to war right away and in the way that would be against the law cause no 1 messes with a mans family in that way if it was me the man who made the claim would have be dead cause I would have killed the mother fucker for messing with my family you can mess with me all you want but not mine and that means not my family and that neans anyone i consider to be my family

Poorly written story and writer is evidently ignorant that a simple DNA testing is relatively simple to get and would have undone this whole lengthy goofy threat in a matter of days with proof of that test result. Dumb to suggest the father in law even needed to be a part of this story. Maybe the writer is living under a rock isn't aware of this technology?

Fraud on the court in some states filing a lawsuit like that is a Fraud punishable by five to ten years in the state prison. Otherwise lawsuits would be flying like sparrows and everyone would get crapped on. The Civil law system would come to a complete stop instead of the snail craw it's at.

Uh....... a simple DNA test for the child and the father would settle the claim. The rest was just unnecessary. It would have been a better story had the husband explored a legal suit against the false claimant. Would this be a form of fraud? Still an interesting concept story by HDK.

An interesting plot line and idea. With DNA testing available Richards would have to prove he was the father before anything happened and any lawyer would insist on one being done before considering advising a settlement. So I can't see how the plot by Richards would work and he committed a crime by claiming paternity and attempting to extort money. So clever idea by HDK but it really doesn't work so I struggled to believe the plot. BardnotBard

I stand corrected in the United States paternity fraud is not against the law any longer so is not punishable by the law however blackmail and extortion is and is punishable up to 15 years and what this man in the story is extortion and attempt to blackmail

What a load of crap! There’s no way her father would have paid that amount of money without first demanding a paternity test. Doing so doesn’t cast doubt on his daughter’s reputation. Rather it serves to ensure her honor remains intact. What the sniffling little prick was doing was extortion. For the father to have given in and paid the money, he would only be cementing his belief that his daughter was a cheating slut. Suspension of disbelief FAIL!!

I'm not sure this writer understands the reasoning for a DNA test at least not fully yes any man can claim perternety on any newborn child that is the exact reason why DNA test was created this story made it sound like a father is weak if some strange man claims to be the biological father of the kid in question when in reality if the husband/father responds with show me the DNA test results that is not showing weakness that is in fact proving to be a loving father and is remaining calm for his family when deep inside he is fuming truth of the matter for the most part a man does not know how he would react in this situation without ever having to face it though I will admit a few does know how they would act which is why I do agree but at the same time I don't agree with the comment my husband @phoenixlore1981 said I don't agree that all men would act like he said they would but I do agree that they would be wanting to go to war the kind of war is what I disagree with just I also agree that a dad isn't just going to offer money to the person making the claim the husband in this story is correct offering to throw money at it cost not just the father to have no self respect but would cost his entire family to have no respect which is why I agree a man wouldn't act in that manner I do fully agree when my husband said if it was him he would have killed the man that's 100 percent truth there is nothing more important to my husband than his family and to threaten his family is signing a death warrant he would care about the consequences he may have to face I have to stop him more than once from going to far when someone was messing with me with this being in terms of the father's kid if a man which I say about 80 percent of them would react in the manner my husband said was to act in that manner I don't believe anything could stop but I don't believe all men would act that way I believe about 10 percent would respond calmly and demand a DNA test just like I believe some would allow it and do nothing about it

What part of FICTION is not clear? Besides, the comment section would be my last source of information, especially legal.

Thank you HDK for your tale.

somewhere east of Omaha

Story is too preachy.

DNA tests should be mandatory for evey baby. Not only for the biological father but for the baby too. The baby deserves to know their bio father and what traits and illnesses they may biologically have.

To the anon that posted 4 days go if every man had to take a DNA test that could possibly be a father the hospitals couldn't do nothing else but DNA test meaning there will be a lot of lives lost so that way of thinking makes you sound like a complete idiot. So do us all a favor quit commenting before you lower the rest of ours iq