All Comments on 'Plus One'

It was well written but I have personal issues with some of the content. I'm glad you gave her the way to opt out, especially since there are elements that would have made me do so. Who the heck is Victoria that she is invited to join them? I would demand an answer from my man, D/s or not. Lit stories have given me a knee jerk reaction to the question, "Do you trust me?" as it almost always means a violation of trust is about to happen. His petty dickish behavior at the beginning comes across as immature not dominant.

Dickish behavior? Please be more specific. And while I agree that springing an unexpected third party onto a sub may cross a line with some, in this case, although not revealed in the story, it had been discussed with her prior. Just no time frame was decided on. These two are in a long running D/s relatiomship and neither are new to the BDSM world or each other. Thanks for the feedback.

Bringing in a third party without consent isn't "unexpected" or "surprise sex" , the exact words for it is rape and sexual assault. Obviously this wasn't unexpected, because not only does the new liver blatantly ignore her option to choose, but she expressed zero lack hesitation or sick, not does her dom give her an option to safe word out, the story of thing a sane couple does when there's clearly a possibility she might have any problem with lesbianism or threesomes.

Basically we have to gloss over and ignore that there's no depth to the encounter other than raw sensation to assume that there's not something dickish in his behavior. Given that many readers are here for more than just fap, it's not surprising that he read it that way.

And yeah, it does seem that do you trust me in literotica stories is the emotionally manipulative trust -violating equivalent of real lives "if you really loved me, you arent would...."

Trust requires a foundation.

I've done something similar to this with my wife/girl. I can tell you personally that there was a lot of talking about the fantasy and a great amount of negotiation/communication prior to the event. She knew the girl well; although there had not been any formal agreement that she would be the one, we had talked about our mutual attraction and she knew I had started talking to her about a future scene. Safewords, both verbal and non, were well established and she had been told that something special from her fantasy list would be checked off soon, perhaps within the month. Given that, neither of us felt any form of assault occurred. I think that coming from a R/L poly BDSM background, as I do, these details are assumed and alluded to by the author. They simply do not appear because it slows the story greatly and disrupts the flow. Well written Faded Tapestry.

Daddy's efforts to embarass her in public, especially pinching her when she was about to order, was not dominant behavior. It was silly, immature and what I'd expect from a teenager.

The last comment described the extensive communication that took place before their similar real life experience. Given the endless parade of abusive dreck posted on Lit, I've reached the point of feeling if it isn't included in the story then it didn't happen. Making clear things like relationship history, consent, safe mechanisms does not need to take huge amounts of space in a story. When these things are spread out and folded into a story using only a few well chosen words, they do NOT distract from the hotsexy action. Including these things as a part of what is happening via thoughts, dialogue, descriptions of reactions BUILDS the story. It also frees the reader from concerns and allows them to fully immerse themselves in the hotsexy.

To me, the single most intimate moment of this interlude was when Daddy leaned close and told her she could stop it all with a shake of her head. THAT provided the most information about them, and it was one single sentence tossed in the middle of the sucking and fucking. She didn't stop things. Okay, was that because she really had wanted this, wanted it when in a clear mind? Did she agree because of the magical arousal of the moment that might fade to regret after? Did she refuse to refuse what Daddy wants no matter what her feelings may be, as is too often portrayed?

Daddy and little cuddled and loved after. Wonderful. I'm still left wondering about too many things. Things that had they been included would have made this a grand slam.

In general I liked the story a lot, but what I like a lot more is that this conversation about consent, trust, and realism is happening in the comments. This particular story would push me too far in reality, but it wasn't the type of violent and derogatory story that makes me so uncomfortable I stop reading. Still, I agree that I'd have been more comfortable with reading it if the fore planning and consent were more explicitly written... The shake your head if this gets to be too much means a lot and shows that daddy actually cares, and a mention of a smile spreading across her face as she locks eyes with Victoria because a long-held fantasy finally is coming to ffruition would have given me the context to know that she really wanted it and daddy was helping fulfill her fantasy, not coercing her into one of his. My panties are thoroughly wet, so I can't complain too much, but a few more sentences and I wouldn't have had any pause. Thanks to everyone who is expressing desire for these details to be included so the writers can know their audience a little better.