by ur_firman
When the first sentence is it had just been nearly a week since I raped her , that's enough for me to not go further ! 1 star for trying to pull this shit on us !
Rapist's should have their cock's cut off, awful rubbish, zero points. First sentence said it all.
I stopped reading this at: "it had been nearly a week since I raped her"! (1st sentence)...why? The right place for a rapist is in jail being abused by all the others. Dead would be easy for them! So this a sick beginning and I could imagine that what follows that must be rotten and smelly! 1* (where are the negative ratings when we need them?)
It was likely "play rape" for her, and she couldn't wait to get his cock deeply into her again. Surprised that so many people don't understand that married women crave a good fucking. Keep writing!
You want this rapist in jail but love when a man burns his bitch.How many here love a husband that gets revenge on a cheating wife but here you act so moral about this man...GO FIGURE.
For posting this here.Non consent batman.Rape? Really? Pervert.
Great story..all real husbands love having the wige satisfied.
Seemed like a pointless story without the preceeding circumstances. Just skimmed after the first couple of paragraphs.
It might have been better received in non-consent where they like that kind of shit.
These suckers read the stories then leave an Anonymous post. If you can't use you own name or the name you write in then you are sad fucks..
When you start a story with it had been a week since I raped her, it calls in all kinds of questions. Makes the reader feel like they have missed something. Turns them off to continuing. Was it really rape? Was it just rough sex between consenting adults. Because I am really turned off by the crime of rape. I have many perversions, but forcefully raping a non consenting person is not hot at all. So I tend to stop reading. Now if it was just forceful sex with someone who wants it like that it's totally different. Back story is very important. Just my two cents.