by swingerjoe
I like above all this writer's sense of humour...This story is easy to read , funny and with the necessary twist in the end...4*
Well told . It niggles at me the wife didn't trust the husband . Maybe an hour of unconditional surrender was a bit much .0 to 50 shades is a bit of a leap. The next level story involves role play , safe words , silk handkerchiefs and timer.
It sounded like the husband was disappointed he didn't get to humiliate and abuse his wife? She made herself available to him as a wife and lover, but not as some submissive brainless sex toy. But brainless submissive sex toy is what he prefers?
Sorry if I missed the plot, and the point. Really sorry for the wife if this is what her marriage has become.
HA, Ha, Ha....
Can't breathe........inhale!!!
Laugh quietly to myself.
I swear you wrote my wife in that story.
AMerryman
Nope, you didn't get it. Not even a little bit. Just move along to the next story.
From a couple that supposedly talks about everything to people who play BDSM games? I don't think so. It was obvious from the temperment and personality you gave her that she wasn't going for his game. And I felt the end would have been better served had he just turned around and went back to work when she refused. Too obvious, not clever and sure not entertaining. 1 star.
....because it was all in my head....
Cheap shot and a real let down from a fantasy high.
But if I could score it, I'd give it 4 stars.
Very, clean writing. You put us inside your character's mind with his internal dialog and led us along a very interesting experiential path.
Sadly, it all came to a halt, like a record player arm being pulled across the record with that characteristic "zippers" kind of scratch. Everybody stops, looks at the Di and and asks, "what?".
And like them, I feel slightly cheated. But it's good story telling....so I thank you.
If you're going to write BDSM stories at least put them in that category. This was just awful.
Don't care much for spanking and such , but at least there was no cheating. There's that.