All Comments on 'Interview with the Sex Therapist'

What was this story about? I'm not even sure I read about any sex.

Are you trying to set an alternative world. One in the future. Whatever. It leaves the reader without any idea of setting so as to grasp what more's you are trying to criticize. No fun in reading this just work.

I don't think I am out of line by saying the following. The rules do not specify that a comment should be posted by a writer, and neither of the posters are. One poster, well I'm not really sure what he was saying. He may be a PHD for all I know. The other poster said, he didn't know IF he read anything about sex. Whatever you think, Lawrence wrote the best stories for his time, and he is easier to read than James. It was a story. "She went to the rest room

and took off her panties" is part of a plot line . Is it relevant? If you

want to know the truth, Interview with The Sex Therapist

was a lot of fun to write.

The problem with ones who read it so far(?) is that the couple

are NOT boring enough to be realistic. Fun is getting laid, but you

cannot divorcing yourself from reality. Except through sexual

fantasy or by taking a drug.

If someone

wanted to they could just say Lady Chatterly's Lover is a story about a woman having sex beneath her breeding. But that it isn't really erotica. There were probably as many body parts in the

novel as there is in one of my stories. I have read erotica that sounds like porn, although they are two different media. My last story and a lot of stories were not well recieved(scores) and I don't know what the problem is with the story. Some people take

their screwing around very seriously, I reckon. Like we

adventurers or a brave legion of knights

I think my Mad Therapist story is supposed to have sexual action, sexual innuendo and sexual reference from beginning to end. Plus, it isn't conventional enough -- that's a humorous thought. As an erotic story it is not a royal

boner, but it's clear and includes sex. I see a lot of my stories that should be read and re-written by someone more cosmopolitan that me. If everyone else is using an editor, then I'm just

pissing in the wind, because I'd rather do it.

I'm not asking for high marks or praise. Just don't be vague, or

make scathing remarks without defending them. You want to cull out

the writing group, do it a different way.

.

I think you tried too hard to be clever.

Let your critics imagine a public penis contest, laying out their 10"-17" imaginary cocks, before voting? Now you'll have no readership at all! With an average sized penis at best, male readership has little understanding of the lengths women go to to enhance their attributes, whereas men openly boast about [but are reluctant to prove] their love-making skills!

Why not post sensible comments to enhance, rather than complain that Middleaged Authors didn't really get your rocks off, the way you were expecting them to?

Stupid, ridiculous, failure at writing an erotic story. Try again.

You start at nonsense early on.